Adjoint Plugin: 1 Introduction#

Introduction#

In this notebook, we will introduce the adjoint plugin of Tidy3D. The adjoint plugin allows users to take derivatives of arbitrary functions involving Tidy3D simulations through the use of the “adjoint method”. The advantage of the adjoint method is that the gradients can be computed using only two FDTD simulations, independent of the number of parameters. This makes it possible to do gradient-based optimization or sensitivity analysis of devices with enormous numbers of parameters with minimal computational overhead. For more information on the technical details of the adjoint method and what it can be used for, we recommend these references (with links to their pre-print versions):

If you want to skip to some case studies of the adjoint plugin being used for some applications, see the

Function differentiation#

The adjoint package enables users to take derivatives of functions that involve a Tidy3D simulation. For a bit of context, let’s first talk about what we mean when we talk about differentiating functions in our programs. Say in our program we have programmatically defined a function of one variable \(f(x)\). For example:

def f(x):
   return x**2

Now, we wish to evaluate \(\frac{df(x)}{dx}\).

If we know \(\frac{df}{dx}\) analytically, this is just a matter of writing a new function to compute this derivative, for example:

def df(x):
    return 2*x

However, many of the more interesting and complex functions tend to compose several sub-functions together, for example

\[f(x) = h(y) = h(g(x))\]

might be written in a program as

def f(x):
    y = x**2
    return 5 * y - y**3

As one can imagine, defining the derivative by hand can quickly become too daunting of a task as the complexity grows.

However, we can simplify things greatly with knowledge of the derivatives of the simpler functions that make up \(f\). Following the chain rule, we can write the derivative of \(f\) above as

\[\frac{df}{dx}=\frac{dh}{dy}\frac{dg}{dx}(x)\]

Thus, if we know the derivatives of the composite functions \(h\) and \(g\), we can construct the derivative of \(f\) by multiplying all of the derivatives of the composite functions. This idea is straightforwardly generalized to functions of several inputs and outputs, and even functions that can be written more generally as a more complex “computational graph” rather than a sequence of operations.

Automatic differentiation#

The idea of a technique called “automatic differentiation” is to provide a way to compute these derivatives of composite functions in programming languages both efficiently and without the user needing to define anything by hand.

Automatic differentiation works by defining “derivative rules” for each fundamental operation that the user might incorporate in his or her function. For example, derivative rules for h and g, in the example above may be used to help define the derivative for f. When the function is evaluated, all of the derivative information corresponding to each operation in the function are stitched together using the chain rule to construct a derivative for the entire function. Thus, functions of arbitrary complexity can be differentiated without deriving anything beyond just the derivative rules for the most basic operations contained within.

This capability is provided by many programming packages, but we chose to utilize one from the “jax” package as it provides the flexibility and extendibility we needed for integrating this functionality into Tidy3D.

Using jax, we may write a function \(f\) using most of the fundamental operations in python and numpy. In jax both the operations and their derivatives are tracked when the function is called. Thus, jax gives the option to apply jax.grad to this function, which uses all of the derivative information and the chain rule to construct a new function that gives the derivative of the function with respect to its input arguments.

This brings us back to the adjoint plugin. The point of the adjoint plugin is to extend jax’s automatic differentiation capability to allow it to track functions that involve Tidy3D simulations in their computational graph. In essence, we privode the “derivative” of the tidy3d.web.run() function, using the adjoint method, to tell jax how to differentiate functions that might involve both the setting up and postprocessing of a tidy3d simulation and its data. The end result is a framework where users can set up modeling and optimizations and utilize jax automatic differentiation for optimization and sensitivity analysis efficiently and without needing to derive a single derivative rule.

In his notebook, we will give an overview of how jax works for beginners and provide simple example of the plugin. More complex case studies and examples will be provided in other notebooks, linked here:

Automatic Differentiation using jax#

Before jumping into any Tidy3D simulations, we will give a bit of a primer on using jax for automatic differentiation. For more details, we highly recommend checking out jax’s tutorial on the subject, as we’ll be covering a lot of the same topics but in less depth.

First, we will import jax and its numpy wrapper, which provides most of the same functionality, but allows derivative tracking.

Tip 1: if you run into an obscure error using jax, the first thing to check is whether you’re using the jax.numpy wrapper instead of regular numpy in your function, as otherwise you will get errors from jax that are not super clear.

[1]:
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp
import matplotlib.pylab as plt

Say we have a function \(f\) that performs several operations on a single variable.

We can define this function f in python and also derive its derivative for this simple case, which we write as a function df.

[2]:
def f(x):
    return 5 * jnp.sin(x) - x**2 + x


def df(x):
    return 5 * jnp.cos(x) - 2 * x + 1

Let’s evaluate these functions at several points and plot them.

[3]:
xs = jnp.linspace(-1, 3, 1001)
plt.plot(xs, f(xs), label="f(x)")
plt.plot(xs, df(xs), label="df/dx(x)")
plt.xlabel("x")
plt.legend()
plt.show()

../_images/notebooks_AdjointPlugin_1_Intro_6_0.png

Now let’s use jax to compute the derivative for us and see how it compares to our analytical derivative.

We first call jax.grad(f), which returns a new function that can be evaluated at x to give the derivative df/dx(x).

For more details on jax.grad and the various other inputs it can take, refer to its documentation here.

[4]:
# get the gradient as a function of x
df_jax = jax.grad(f)

# get a set of points to feed the derivative function one by one (for now)
xs_jax = jnp.linspace(-1, 3, 21)
df_jax_eval = [df_jax(x) for x in xs_jax]

plt.plot(xs, f(xs), label="f(x)")
plt.plot(xs, df(xs), label="df/dx(x) [analytical]")
plt.plot(xs_jax, df_jax_eval, "k.", label="df/dx(x) [using jax]")
plt.xlabel("x")
plt.legend()
plt.show()

../_images/notebooks_AdjointPlugin_1_Intro_8_0.png

Note: jax provides several other useful gradient wrappers, which can be used in different contexts.

For example jax.value_and_grad returns both the function return value and the gradient value, which is useful to avoid repetitive computation if you need the value as the jax.grad call must evaluate f.

[5]:
f_and_df = jax.value_and_grad(f)
vals_and_grads = [f_and_df(x) for x in xs_jax]
fs, dfs = list(zip(*vals_and_grads))

plt.plot(xs_jax, fs, label="f(x)")
plt.plot(xs, df(xs), label="df/dx(x) [analytical]")
plt.plot(xs_jax, df_jax_eval, "k.", label="df/dx(x) [using jax]")
plt.xlabel("x")
plt.legend()
plt.show()

../_images/notebooks_AdjointPlugin_1_Intro_10_0.png

We can also take an elementwise gradient using jax.vmap, which vectorizes our gradient function.

[6]:
df_jax_vectorized = jax.vmap(jax.grad(f))

# get a set of points to feed the derivative function one by one (for now)
df_jax_eval = df_jax_vectorized(xs)

plt.plot(xs, f(xs), label="f(x)")
plt.plot(xs, df(xs), label="df/dx(x) [analytical]")
plt.plot(xs, df_jax_eval, "k-.", label="df/dx(x) [using jax]")
plt.xlabel("x")
plt.legend()
plt.show()

../_images/notebooks_AdjointPlugin_1_Intro_12_0.png

Before we continue, there are a few things to watch out for when using jax for gradient calculation:

  1. jax.grad outputs doesn’t automatically convert input arguments from int to float, so avoid passing int types to your functions.

[7]:
# ok
print(df_jax(1.0))

# errors
try:
    df_jax(1)
except TypeError as e:
    print(repr(e))

1.7015114
TypeError('grad requires real- or complex-valued inputs (input dtype that is a sub-dtype of np.inexact), but got int32. If you want to use Boolean- or integer-valued inputs, use vjp or set allow_int to True.')
  1. When differentiating with respect to several arguments, you need to tell jax.grad which arguments you want to take the derivative with respect to as a tuple in indices. Otherwise it will take the derivative with respect to only the first argument.

[8]:
def g(x, y, z):
    return x * y + z**2


# only gives dg/dx
dg = jax.grad(g)
dgdx = dg(1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
print(f"dgdx={dgdx}")

# gives derivative w.r.t. all three args
dg_all = jax.grad(g, argnums=(0, 1, 2))
dgdx, dgdy, dgdz = dg_all(1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
print(f"dgdx={dgdx}, dgdy={dgdy}, dgdz={dgdz}")

dgdx=1.0
dgdx=1.0, dgdy=1.0, dgdz=2.0

Incorporating Automatic Differentiation in Tidy3D#

With that basic introduction to automatic differentiation using jax, we can now show how the tidy3d.plugins.adjointlets us do the same thing but where our functions can now involve setting up, running, and postprocessing a tidy3d.Simulation.

We’ll need to import special Jax components from the adjoint plugin for this to work. These components are registered with jax so it knows how to handle them in its automatic differentiation pipeline.

We’ll also need to import a special web.run() wrapper from the plugin. This tidy3d.plugins.adjoint.web.run function operates the same as web.run(), except its derivative rules are defined in the backend using the adjoint method. Thus, jax will know how to “differentiate” tidy3d.plugins.adjoint.web.run and it can be used within a function that we want to take derivatives with respect to.

Here is a diagram showing how the input arguments of our function f are related to the JaxSimulation and how the JaxSimulationData output of tidy3d.plugins.adjoint.web.run is related to the return value of f. This diagram can be a useful reference when moving through this section.

9828573e0e4f4f0a9dfeb98353162b89

Introducing JaxSimuation#

Now we will show how to set up a very simple function using the adjoint plugin and differentiate it.

First, both our Simulation and some of its .structures may be dependent on the function arguments. Therefore, we need to use a special Simulation subclass called JaxSimulation.

JaxSimulation is just a jax-compatible stand in for Simulation and behaves almost entirely the same, except for a few important differences:

  1. it accepts an additional field .input_structures. These input_structures are tidy3d structures that can depend on the function arguments, and therefore need to be, jax-compatible, themselves. Thus, the structures used in this field must be of the jax-compatible type JaxStructure, which itself contains a .medium field of type JaxMedium and a .geometry field that is of type JaxBox. The center, size, and permittivity fields of these components may all depend on the function input arguments and the final gradients of the function will be given with respect to the values these fields.

At the time of publishing, only JaxStructures with geometry of JaxBox are supported. However, the medium may contain JaxMedium, JaxAnisotropicMedium, or JaxCustomMedium.

Any extraneous Structures can be added to the JaxSimulation.structures as long as they don’t depend on the funciton arguments. These structures will still influence the simulation result as normal, but are “static”.

The input_structures are always assumed to be added on top of the existing .structures.

  1. it accepts another additional field .output_monitors, which define the set of monitors with corresponding data that the return value of our function will depend on. Note that at the time of writing, only ModeMonitor are supported.

  2. to convert a JaxSimulation to a Simulation, one may call sim, info = JaxSimulation.to_simulation() where the sim is the Simulation with all structures and monitors put together and info is just a special information container that is needed to reconstruct the JaxSimulation from sim using JaxSimulation.from_simulation(sim, info).

Let us now import these new Jax Tidy3d types and use them in an example.

[9]:
import tidy3d as td
from tidy3d.plugins.adjoint import JaxSimulation, JaxStructure, JaxMedium, JaxBox

Simulation example#

In our example, we will set up a function that involves a simulation of transmission through a waveguide in the presence of a scatterer.

This scatterer geometry and material properties will depend on the function input arguments.

The output of the function will simply be the power transmitted into the 0th order mode.

We will then take the gradient of the output of this function (power) with respect to the scatterer geometric and medium properties using jax.

To start, it can often be helpful to break our function up into a few parts for debugging.

Therefore, we will introduce one function to make the JaxSimulation given the input arguments and one function to postprocess the result.

[10]:
def make_simulation(center: float, size: float, eps: float) -> JaxSimulation:
    """Makes a simulation with a variable scatter width, height, and relative permittivity."""

    wavelength = 1.0
    freq0 = td.C_0 / wavelength
    dl = 0.02

    # a "static" structure
    waveguide = td.Structure(
        geometry=td.Box(size=(td.inf, 0.3, 0.2)), medium=td.Medium(permittivity=2.0)
    )

    # our "forward" soruce
    mode_src = td.ModeSource(
        size=(0, 1.5, 1.5),
        center=(-0.9, 0, 0),
        mode_index=0,
        source_time=td.GaussianPulse(freq0=freq0, fwidth=freq0 / 10),
        direction="+",
    )

    # a monitor to store data that our overall function will depend on
    mode_mnt = td.ModeMonitor(
        size=(0, 1.5, 1.5),
        center=(+0.9, 0, 0),
        mode_spec=mode_src.mode_spec,
        freqs=[freq0],
        name="mode",
    )

    # the structure that depends on the input parameters, which we will differentiate our function w.r.t
    scatterer = JaxStructure(
        geometry=JaxBox(
            center=center,
            size=size,
        ),
        medium=JaxMedium(permittivity=eps),
    )

    return JaxSimulation(
        size=(2, 2, 2),
        run_time=1e-12,
        structures=[waveguide],
        input_structures=[scatterer],
        sources=[mode_src],
        output_monitors=[mode_mnt],
        boundary_spec=td.BoundarySpec.all_sides(td.PML()),
        grid_spec=td.GridSpec.uniform(dl=dl),
    )

Note: adding .monitors to the JaxSimulation will work as intended, but the function being differentiated should not depend on data corresponding to these monitors. This can, however,be useful for debugging, for example by examining field patterns, as the data will still be accessible in the output data.

Let’s try setting up the simulation and plotting it for starters.

[11]:
# starting set of input parameters
center0 = (0.0, 0.0, 0.0)
size0 = (0.5, 1.0, 1.0)
eps0 = 3.0

jax_sim = make_simulation(center=center0, size=size0, eps=eps0)
_, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(16, 5))

# sim, _ = jax_sim.to_simulation()
for ax, dim in zip(axes, "xyz"):
    jax_sim.plot(**{dim: 0}, ax=ax)
plt.show()

../_images/notebooks_AdjointPlugin_1_Intro_22_0.png

Post-processing the output data#

After the simulation is run, it returns a JaxSimulation, which is a jax-compatible subclass of SimulationData. In addition to the .data corresponding to the .monitors in the JaxSimulation, JaxSimulationData also stores a .output_data, which stores the data corresponding to JaxSimulation.output_monitors. It is the .output_data that our differentiable function should depend on. These output data objects are also Jax subclasses of Tidy3d data objects, so their functionality may be slightly different, but overall can be used in the same way.

Note: currently only .sel() selection is supported in jax-compatible DataArray objects. So you should use .sel() and pass the values you want to select instead of using .interp() or isel()

Let’s write a function that will postprocess our JaxSimulationData and return the power in the mode amplitude of our output mode monitor.

[12]:
from tidy3d.plugins.adjoint import JaxSimulationData


def compute_power(jax_sim_data: JaxSimulationData) -> float:
    """Post process the result of the JaxSimulation run to return the power in the mode at index=0."""

    freq0 = jax_sim_data.simulation.output_monitors[0].freqs[0]
    jax_mode_data = jax_sim_data.output_monitor_data["mode"]
    mode_amps = jax_mode_data.amps
    amp = mode_amps.sel(direction="+", f=freq0, mode_index=0)
    return abs(amp) ** 2

Defining the tidy3d simulation function for differentiation#

Next, we can import the tidy3d.plugins.adjoint.web.run function and put all the pieces together into a single function to compute the 0th order transmitted power as a function of center, size, and eps (relative permittivty) of the scatterer.

[13]:
from tidy3d.plugins.adjoint.web import run as run_adjoint

[14]:
def power(center: float, size: float, eps: float) -> float:
    """Compute power transmitted into 0th order mode given a set of scatterer parameters."""
    jax_sim = make_simulation(center=center, size=size, eps=eps)
    jax_sim_data = run_adjoint(jax_sim, task_name="adjoint_power", verbose=True)
    return compute_power(jax_sim_data)

Running and differentiating the simulation using jax#

Finally, using the jax tools described earlier, we can differentiate this power function.

For demonstration, let’s use jax.value_and_grad to both compute the power and the gradient w.r.t. each of the 3 input parameters.

[15]:
d_power = jax.value_and_grad(power, argnums=(0, 1, 2))

We will run this function and assign variables to the power values and the gradients returned.

Note that running this will set off two separate tasks, one after another, called, "adjoint_power_fwd" and "adjoint_power_adj".

The first is evaluating our simulation in “forward mode”, computing the power and stashing information needed for gradient computation.

The second step runs the “adjoint” simulation, in which the output monitor is converted to a source and the simulation is re-run.

The results of both of these simulations runs are combined behind the scene to tell jax how to compute the gradient for us.

[16]:
power_value, (dp_center, dp_dsize, dp_deps) = d_power(center0, size0, eps0)

[13:23:58] Created task 'adjoint_power_fwd' with task_id                                              webapi.py:139
           'fdve-e04381b1-827a-40a0-a0e5-e41924bbe546v1'.                                                          
[13:24:00] status = queued                                                                            webapi.py:269
[13:24:03] status = preprocess                                                                        webapi.py:263
[13:24:09] Maximum FlexCredit cost: 0.025. Use 'web.real_cost(task_id)' to get the billed FlexCredit cost webapi.py:286
           after a simulation run.                                                                                 
           starting up solver                                                                         webapi.py:290
           running solver                                                                             webapi.py:300
[13:24:19] early shutoff detected, exiting.                                                           webapi.py:313
           status = postprocess                                                                       webapi.py:330
[13:24:23] status = success                                                                           webapi.py:337
[13:24:34] loading SimulationData from simulation_data.hdf5                                           webapi.py:512
[13:24:35] Created task 'adjoint_power_adj' with task_id                                              webapi.py:139
           'fdve-f8af0cf2-5f89-4b28-8c5f-7dc00e73b70ev1'.                                                          
[13:24:37] status = queued                                                                            webapi.py:269
[13:24:39] status = preprocess                                                                        webapi.py:263
[13:24:44] Maximum FlexCredit cost: 0.025. Use 'web.real_cost(task_id)' to get the billed FlexCredit cost webapi.py:286
           after a simulation run.                                                                                 
           starting up solver                                                                         webapi.py:290
           running solver                                                                             webapi.py:300
[13:24:54] early shutoff detected, exiting.                                                           webapi.py:313
[13:24:55] status = postprocess                                                                       webapi.py:330
[13:25:08] loading SimulationData from simulation_data.hdf5                                           webapi.py:512

Note: the gradient evaluation functions returned by jax.grad() do not accept keyword arguments (ie. center=(0.,0.,0.)) and instead accept positional arguments (without the argument name). You may run across this when trying to evaluate gradients so it’s a good idea to keep in mind.

We can take a look at our computed power and gradient information.

[17]:
print(f"power = {power_value:.3f}")
print(f"d_power/d_center = {dp_center}")
print(f"d_power/d_size = {dp_dsize}")
print(f"d_power/d_eps = {dp_deps}")

power = 0.548
d_power/d_center = (-0.006544675678014755, -0.019715994596481323, 0.03331966698169708)
d_power/d_size = (-0.024730553850531578, 0.13145551085472107, -0.14747852087020874)
d_power/d_eps = -0.1650194376707077

From this, we can infer several things that fit our intuition, for example that: * the transmitted power should decrease if we increase the permittivity of our scatterer. * the transmitted power does not depend strongly on the position of the scatterer along the propagation direction.

Conclusion & Next Steps#

This gives the most basic introduction to the principles behind the adjoint plugin.

In subsequent notebooks, we will show how to: * Check the gradients returned by this method against brute force computed gradients for accuracy. * Perform gradient-based optimization using the adjoint plugin.

[ ]: